fix(spanner): support transaction tags in partition DML #3473
Conversation
product-auto-label
bot
added
size: m
rahul2393
force-pushed
the
support-txn-tag
branch
from
40ffebd to
62cb4da
Compare
...spanner/src/main/java/com/google/cloud/spanner/AbstractMultiplexedSessionDatabaseClient.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @@ -197,6 +197,10 @@ public static ReadQueryUpdateTransactionOption tag(String name) { | |||
| return new TagOption(name); | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| public static ReadQueryUpdateTransactionOption transactionTag(String name) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I feel this would bring in confusion to customers, mainly because transaction tags are supported in read-write transactions by using Options.tag. Customers might try using this Options.transactionTag for read-write and will not work.
https://cloud.google.com/spanner/docs/introspection/troubleshooting-with-tags#java_1
Should we rename this to be more specific to PDML or is this somehow restricted to be used only for pdml transaction?
| @@ -194,22 +194,29 @@ ExecuteSqlRequest newTransactionRequestFrom(final Statement statement, final Opt | |||
| if (options.hasTag()) { | |||
| requestOptionsBuilder.setRequestTag(options.tag()); | |||
| } | |||
| if (options.hasTransactionTag()) { | |||
| requestOptionsBuilder.setTransactionTag(options.transactionTag()); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The official documentation states that transaction tags not supported for read-only transactions and are supported for read-write, but there’s no mention of partitioned DML transactions.
can you please verify if transaction tags are indeed supported for pdml txn?
|
Closing this because sending transactionTag in partitionDML is no-op |
Fixes: #3347
Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> ☕️
If you write sample code, please follow the samples format.